A Time for Accountability

I went to bed last night like many of you reading this right now did: pissed off, dejected, completely over “it”. The “it” of course being this iteration of the Detroit Red Wings, a team with talent up and down the lineup, but sub-par results to show for it. I didn’t bother to read the postgame comments from the players and coaching staff, because at this point it’s almost laughable how predictable these guys are. “Just need to play better.” “Didn’t play for a full 60 minutes.” “Just need to find a way to work through this.” These and other favorite comments have been a staple of the Red Wings under Mike Babcock, which isn’t to say it’s the wrong way to handle things. It just is what it is and we’ve come to expect that after a loss, the Wings will put on the PR hat and say nothing of any value. Do they owe it to us? Probably not. But it sure would be nice to see after losing YET AGAIN to the rival Sharks. The lack of emotion is the crux of the problem, and it’s a problem that’s been growing for some time now.

So imagine my shock when Babcock actually deviates from the course and decides not to press the button on his arm that delivers his programmed responses. From Teddy Kulfan:

Before the Wings practice Friday, coach Mike Babcock will meet with his team.

“Do we want to be a good team or not?” said Babcock, about what will be the subject matter. “Life doesn’t just go on good for you. You make a decision it’s going to go good for you. You decide for yourself you’re going to be successful. You decide for yourself that you’re going to make a difference and have a good career. No one just gives you stuff.

“The other teams are trying to. We have some decisions to make.”

A cursory glance would lead the non-informed follower of the Wings to find this about as interesting as a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. But for those that follow Babcock, this is a departure from the norm. This is venturing into an area that we rarely see from a guy who does must of the talking with his scowl and piercing stare. And, frankly, this is a good thing. Of course, there’s some out there that will say this is nothing more than Babcock posturing to make the masses believe that he is still in control of this team, but the real fact is that Babcock is NOT in control of this team by his own choice. He recognizes that he has a group of veterans on the ice that can feel the pulse of the locker room and share the burden of leadership, and he’s let them run with it. That leadership looks a little something like this. From Helene St. James:

“We’ve just got to stay positive. We have to. There will be people that will be negative enough. Players in here, we have to stick together and be positive.

If you continue through the article, the next part is pure drama. Apparently, Babcock walked away and dismissed questions about the production of two of his “leaders”, which the Chief correctly points out could be a not-so-subtle jab at both the contributions and leadership attributes of Zetterberg and Datsyuk. Again, folks will say that this is a sure sign that Babcock is nothing more than a guy in a suit, but the truth is that Babcock is doing exactly what he needs to do: demanding accountability.

Make no mistake, over the past three seasons, there’s been no accountability. There’s been excuses and there’s been injuries and there’s been everything under the sun except for the guys with the extra letter on their sweater stepping up and saying the blame falls on them. Well, except for Kris Draper, whose absence is glaringly obvious from the lack of leadership this team has shown this season. While we may not miss his lack of production, there’s no denying the fact that the man was a leader, and I’ll be one of the first to connect the dots and say that the lack of leadership in the locker room is  contributing to the craptastic effort that is quickly becoming a staple of this Red Wings team. If you think this is a veiled shot at captain Nicklas Lidstrom, then let me set all doubts aside and make it very clear:

Lidstrom’s leadership style is not cutting it.

That’s no knock against a great human being and a fantastic hockey player. The fact is, though, that when the girt and heart that was Steve Yzerman left and retired, Lidstrom had to count on others to bring that same sense of purpose to the locker room in Detroit. Look no further than a guy like Dallas Drake, a guy that all of us hated during most of his career, but quickly embraced when he made it clear he wanted a Stanley Cup and would step on toes in the locker room if that meant getting one. Draper was the same way, but the urgency with him was diminished due to the success he already had throughout his Wings career. Yet through it all was Lidstrom, quietly leading and contributing with his play on the ice while others took care of the administrative “duties” in the locker room. Now there’s no one there, no safety net to get angry and peel the paint in the locker room. Just Lidstrom, Zetterberg, Datsyuk and newly minted Niklas Kronwall, all preaching patience and cohesiveness and that “things will come in due time.” It’s the same dumb message we’ve heard for the last three years. It’s tired. No, it’s REALLY tired.

I watched Joe Pavelski score that shorthanded goal last night and wondered if the Wings would just pack it in and go through the motions in the second period. Sure enough, the intensity of the first period was gone, replaced by methodical shot after methodical shot from the point, with nobody crashing the net looking for rebounds. There was no panic. The Wings were patient, just like their on-ice leadership core wanted them to be. And while all that patience and precision was “working out the kinks,” the Sharks got down to business and took it to the Wings. They were urgent while Detroit was “patient.” They did the little things while Detroit played “together.” And at the end of the game, the scoreboard showed whose system and methodology was far superior. If you want proof, just watch Joe Thornton steal the puck from Zetterberg while he maneuvered for the “right” shot in the second period, go the other way and essentially kick Detroit’s ass to the curb.

So if Mike Babcock wants to call this team together today and take accountability for trying to get this team back on track, then I applaud him. It’s obvious that Lidstrom, Zetterberg, Datsyuk and Kronwall aren’t going to do it, and don’t give me the “it’s not in their nature as quiet leaders” bullshit. It’s painfully obvious that this quiet “lead by example” strategy isn’t getting it done, and Datsyuk and Zetterberg’s stat sheet shows it. I get that these guys can’t be something they aren’t, and that’s fine. But part of their job is finding someone who isn’t afraid to get mad and push the envelope, and they all have failed terrifically in that effort. It’s funny, a guy like Dan Cleary seems like a natural fit to step up and be the angry force in the locker room, but it doesn’t seem like that’s happened yet. Why the hell not? For a guy that’s been marginal in terms of play this year, I would expect him to make up for it in the locker room. Doesn’t seem to be the case.

So here we are, with Mike Babcock now playing the bad cop and stepping to the plate to try and take control of this thing again. If it doesn’t work out, the blame doesn’t all fall on him. He’s got four guys who call themselves leaders in that locker room, and it’s about time they stepped up and pulled this team together. Because right now, this team and their philosophy are so damn tired. We deserve better, and it’s time for the leadership of this team to step up and be accountable for their roles in this mess.

11 thoughts on “A Time for Accountability”

  1. I’m not sure I’m ready to lump Datsyuk in with Zetterberg as far as having the wrong attitude. He hasn’t been laying the z-like platitudes about “staying positive” or the Kronwallian “if the rest of the game goes like the first, we’re good to go” during intermissions.  When Datsyuk was pressed about it, he said in as many English words as he could muster “I’ve been awful” and “I need to play better”.

    Still… that doesn’t detract from the entire message you’re laying.  The Wings need a PLAYER, not a coach in the locker room who’s ready to whip out his own inner (bab)Cock and tell the rest of the fellas to man the fuck up or ask Kenny to ship ’em the fuck out because this Red Wings train is a fucking push cart, not a passenger express to the playoffs.

    1. I agree with the Datsyuk sentiment and I really thought about leaving him out of this. But at the end of the day, he’s got the letter too, so he deserved to be a part. I appreciate that he’s at least acknowledging the fact that he’s sucking right now, but unfortunately that’s the only place he’s really seen as a leader: on the ice. So until the results come, he’s just as accountable as everyone else.

      That said, his teammates need to make it a priority to get him going, and nobody seems wiling to do so. They looked up to the task in the first last night, and Datsyuk got himself in good positions to make something happen and I felt like it was just a matter of time before he tallied. But then the wheels fell off and it was Datsyuk dangling on an island with no help. That’s where his teammates need to light some asses on fire and show some urgency. It’s just a fucking shame to watch.

      1. It’s crazy talk, but I still think Hudler should pull it.  I’m pretty sure there’s still some leftover bitterness in the locker room regarding his defection and I’ve read plenty of little hints and whatnots that the guy’s kind of an unlikable douchebuster in real life, but I think if the midget pimp stands up in the locker room and says “I have as many points as you, Zetterberg, so I’ve got just as much right to talk as you do.” and then lays into them about if they’ve all got a problem then they can shove it up their ugly asses and that he didn’t learn his lesson about hard work and dedication to watch an entire dressing room full of the same kind of shit he got crucified for last year go on this season.  Worst case is that he makes himself a locker room cancer and gets shipped out in a contract year; if that happens, then that little rat is better off for leaving the sinking ship anyway.

        Of course, that’s all part of my rock n’ roll fantasy.  I don’t know who is going to stand up in that locker room and grab the fiery reins that got taken out of Draper’s hands.  There are a ton of good candidates and, as you’ve said, four of those assholes already have letters on the front of their jerseys so that’s kind of their fucking job.

        1. Why not Darren Helm?  Yeah he’s young and he’s not a top line goal scorer, but the kid works his tail off and  excels at his role.  He’s like a young Draper.  He appears to be liked by his teammates.  He’s always giving it his all shift after shift.  I don’t see why he wouldn’t be respected in that dressing room if he stood up and tried to light a fire under some of his teammates’ asses.  

          1. Having spent 48 short hours with the team last season, I will confirm that there is no way in hell that Darren Helm will be the guy to stand up and say something. And if he did, he would likely be laughed at by the other 22 guys in the room. The ONLY thing he has in common with Drapes is the situational plays he’s entrusted with, sadly. 

            I’d love for him to be a leader in that way, but he’s extremely timid and keeps very much to himself. 

          2. I wish we weren’t kidding. I’d KILL to have a guy like Darren Helm but the heart and soul of the team. But seeing them interact, he’s very much an “outskirts” guy. 

            Smith, on the other hand, seems to be very outspoken and personable and not afraid to say “what the fuck is wrong with you assholes?” Maybe a few years away (obviously) but might have that kind of pedigree.

            Not at all a bad suggestion and I hope I didn’t piss all over the fire. HA!

  2. Yzerman was also the “lead by example” type, but he was known for standing up and giving a speech that served as a kick in the ass to the rest of the team. It’s time for one of those speeches.

    I still maintain that Babcock has some accountability here too, but really, there’s enough to go around.

    At this point, I don’t give a shit who steps up. Babcock, Lidstrom, Zetterberg, Helm, Paul Boyer, the usher in section 118. Just turn it around and start winning some games.

    1. maybe they can bring in that kid from Little Big League to show them how fun the game is again by playing pranks and using trick plays.  If that fails to win games they will at least learn some life lessons.

      1. Forget Little Big League, I want the kid from Little Giants.

        You think there’s a way to make “The Annexation of Puerto Rico” a hockey play?

  3. Pingback: Game Day Open Thread: @ Los Angeles « On the Wings

Comments are closed.