Comments on: The Gradient of Failure, November 12th

By: Krononymous

Krononymous — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:02:00 +0000

I think Hank deserves bonus points for manscaping his Brawny beard into a classic 70s pornstache Fu Manchu

By: Steven Roxelle

Steven Roxelle — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 02:21:00 +0000

In reply to Lauren Horne. No, he moved down because it was crowded at 5, haha. I shifted him back over.

By: josh howard

josh howard — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:31:00 +0000

Look.. I love this thing, but you need to do it right. Rather than having numbers… it just needs to have Lidstrom’s face on the left, and Ericsson on the right. That way you have your full spectrum. Now, I would have to say that 10 moves from week to week depending on Ericsson’s play. However, it at least give you a good swing. BTW… not serious about all this. I love how it’s being done and actually don’t think Ericsson sucks too terrible so far this year. Keep up the good work guys and I look forward to seeing everyone except Ericsson in the top of the chart. hahaha

By: Alex

Alex — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:24:00 +0000

Why all the hate on Brad Stuart? I think Howard should be closer to one, he was the only player who showed up during the losing streak. And you guys are being too soft on Shitbox, but until you implement triple digits on your chart, his level of failure will never be accurately represented.

By: Lauren Horne

Lauren Horne — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 21:16:00 +0000

Did Mursak move down on the fail meter because he’s healing? lol