Comments on: Dual Recap: There are a lot of words. Get coffee. https://tpl.detroit.hockey/2010/12/05/dual-recap-there-are-a-lot-of-words-get-coffee/ Archived version of TPL - Hosted by DetroitHockey.Net Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:17:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.3 By: Crater from SoCal https://tpl.detroit.hockey/2010/12/05/dual-recap-there-are-a-lot-of-words-get-coffee/#comment-3123 Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:17:00 +0000 https://tplarchive.detroithockey.net/?p=2532#comment-3123 Being in attendance for both game, I can’t fault Ozzy, as much as i tried… and my girlfriend does fault him she hates him with a passion. I don’t think there was too much he could do, 1 shot was a deflection off a king, the other off a wing. We needed more from our top 2 lines vs the Kings. I didn’t get to see as much of Draper as I’d have liked. I guess you have to ease him into it though. I want to see him get his wheels back.

]]>
By: Marlon Foley https://tpl.detroit.hockey/2010/12/05/dual-recap-there-are-a-lot-of-words-get-coffee/#comment-3122 Mon, 06 Dec 2010 06:59:00 +0000 https://tplarchive.detroithockey.net/?p=2532#comment-3122 I’ve been enamoured with Ruslan Salei since I first saw him on the ice. I was hesitant at first because of his previous season and ensuing back surgery, but relieved at knowing him and Babcock know each other’s styles so well. He may not be getting a lot of points (and hell, if he keeps playing like he is now, I don’t care if he scores 0 goals all season! … okay, 4 all season!) but he plays competent defense.

Last year, whenever the puck went into the defensive zone it would be a lot of hand wringing on my behalf knowing there’d be a good chance Lilja/Mebdeech/Ericsson would be there to screw it up. Now if I know Salei’s on the ice there’s absolutely no worry. He shows a lot of poise and he’s rarely, if ever, flashy – that being a good thing.

Horrible bias aside, I think Salei was not only one of the smartest signings of ANY team in the offseason, but his cost to effectiveness ratio is through the roof.

Also, whoever spiked E’s water bottle with defense juice can bunk with me tonight. It’s the Renaissance of Jonathan Ericsson. And I approve, wholeheartedly.

]]>
By: Michael Petrella https://tpl.detroit.hockey/2010/12/05/dual-recap-there-are-a-lot-of-words-get-coffee/#comment-3121 Mon, 06 Dec 2010 05:19:00 +0000 https://tplarchive.detroithockey.net/?p=2532#comment-3121 In reply to DMN.

Sorry for the lack of Loss Candy this time around. We’ve been working on something big, but that’s no excuse to neglect our responsibilities. If you bear with us, we’ll make it worth the wait…

]]>
By: DMN https://tpl.detroit.hockey/2010/12/05/dual-recap-there-are-a-lot-of-words-get-coffee/#comment-3120 Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:13:00 +0000 https://tplarchive.detroithockey.net/?p=2532#comment-3120 No loss candy? Denied.

]]>
By: Cath Peters https://tpl.detroit.hockey/2010/12/05/dual-recap-there-are-a-lot-of-words-get-coffee/#comment-3119 Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:23:00 +0000 https://tplarchive.detroithockey.net/?p=2532#comment-3119 In reply to J.J..

I think it started last year after Howard had enough starts in a row to feel as though the weight of the team wasn’t on his back every time he was in net. It also helped that I’ve never seen Osgood really direct rebounds to safer areas, and Hasek was as wacky as a fractal in net, but a lot of younger goaltenders seem to be less like sponges and more directing hard shots to particular areas for their defensemen to keep away from any opponents scavenging around for loose pucks.

Once Howard played enough to get comfortable himself, and the team had a much better idea of what he was going to do, they worked together much better and I think everyone kind of relaxed.

]]>
By: J.J. https://tpl.detroit.hockey/2010/12/05/dual-recap-there-are-a-lot-of-words-get-coffee/#comment-3118 Sun, 05 Dec 2010 16:27:00 +0000 https://tplarchive.detroithockey.net/?p=2532#comment-3118 I think the contrast between the Anaheim game and the Los Angeles game shows pretty well what looking at shot counts will do for you. Anaheim took 41 shots on net and Los Angeles took 25. Still, I’d say the real high quality scoring chances were about even in both of those games. Like you said, give me 41 mostly visible and completely stoppable shots over just ten screens and deflections.

The defense was oustanding in Anaheim and they were pretty good in Los Angeles. They’ve actually been pretty good all year. If I had to give them a grade at this point, I’m thinking B+, and that’s only because Jug Danik had to play so much earlier in the season.

]]>
By: Cath Peters https://tpl.detroit.hockey/2010/12/05/dual-recap-there-are-a-lot-of-words-get-coffee/#comment-3117 Sun, 05 Dec 2010 14:47:00 +0000 https://tplarchive.detroithockey.net/?p=2532#comment-3117 Agree with your comment about the defense, Michael.

It’s so weird, but there were times last year when the defense was playing like poopsicles and I looked at the shot counts after the game and were surprised the numbers were so low, because it seemed like the team wall giving up 80 shots a game. This year it’s the opposite. Sometimes I look at the numbers and it doesn’t seem the team gave up that many shots during the game at all because none of them looked all that dangerous and the rebounds were cleared away before secondary and tertiary opportunities could manifest themselves.

I like it because it shows that the skaters have figured out how Tiberius plays and so when he kicks out a rebound they expect it, know where it is going, and get there to take care of the puck. When he first started playing you could tell they weren’t nearly as comfortable with his style and habits, but now he’s a known quantity.

Osgood was quite good, and I was glad to see that. I had visions of a goal on the first shot and then plugging my ears to avoid the wailing and gnashing of teeth and rending of garments that would ensue. #whew 🙂

]]>