Comments on: Buckets Out, Howard Starts Again

By: ChristineRWBNB

ChristineRWBNB — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:27:10 +0000

You know, I want our injured a**kickers back as much as the next fan, but I still want a chance to smack the current roster upside the head. This is not a talentless bunch of placeholders (hello? 2 of the top 2-way players in the damned league!) that we should have to just suck up and deal with until the big guys come back. These guys CAN win and HAVE won games. What they need is consistency and precision, and that's not a matter of talent as much as it is drive and discipline.

Lately, I sit here during the games sounding like Herb Brooks from the movie Miracle: "Poise and control, boys! Poise and control!"

By: Casey

Casey — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:56:20 +0000

I found a really good picture of Osgood on the bench during last night's game:
http://z.hubpages.com/u/767778_f520.jpg

By: Michael Petrella

Michael Petrella — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:53:34 +0000

Yes, Howard is giving the Red Wings the best chance to win. Evidenced by Chris Osgood's inability to win a game since November 5th.

Feel like he's been five wins away from 400 for like six years now...

By: Casey

Casey — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:37:38 +0000

Balls to the Cleary injury and balls-yes! to Jimmy starting again.

At this point I look at it like this. Plain and simple Jimmy's giving us the best chance to win each night. Our offense can't produce at all and the lower the GAA the better.

By: Michael Petrella

Michael Petrella — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:46:54 +0000

I welcome all eight of your readers, but to avoid projectile vomiting, think of it this way:

When all of these guys come back, they should be uber-motivated to make up for lost time, propelling the Red Wings not only into the playoffs, but to make some noise when they get there.

By: chollis

chollis — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:30:15 +0000

I'm debating crawling into a hole and sending all 8 of my readers over here. I'll re-emerge sometime in 2010 when we have a lineup that looks more like the Red Wings and less like the Islanders. Even though that might be an upgrade at this point…

By: Michael Petrella

Michael Petrella — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:03:43 +0000

Yup, I'm with you. I'm sure that with back-to-back games, Osgood will be in on Saturday. But, yes, Osgood needs to get starts to be considered -- ya know -- the STARTER. Here are the facts:

December
Howard - 4 starts (1-2) [80%]
Osgood - 1 start (0-1) [20%]

November
Howard - 8 starts (6-2) [57%]
Osgood - 6 starts (2-3-1) [43%]

October
Howard - 3 starts (0-2-1) [25%]
Osgood - 9 starts (5-2-2) [75%]

It's certainly trending to Howard. Osgood was the unquestioned started in October, but slowly, the tides have turned to J-Ho.

By: EM

EM — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:56:57 +0000

I was thinking the same thing about Howard… while I understand riding a hot goaltender, it still strikes me as odd. Doesn't Oz need to get games in? What happened to Babcock's idea of a rotation? I was wondering if this is somehow similar to Oz's "break" last February, though he hasn't nearly been as atrocious. He's called himself out to be better, so let's hope he's chomping at the bit when he does make his next start (Saturday?)